Case Results

1st Degree Domestic Violence Our client was charged with CDV 1 ^st after an altercation involving his wife. The case was dismissed on the day of the trial. Our client's record will be automatically expunged by the court. He will also not be required to complete any counseling, pay any fines, or do anything else.

1st Degree Sexual Conduct with a Minor

James Snell represented a client charged with criminal sexual conduct w/ a minor in the 1st degree. This is a serious offense that carries a minimum sentence of 25 years up to a possible life sentence. After a nearly week-long trial, the jury returned a verdict of not guilty.

2 Counts Felony DUI with Great Bodily Injury Our client was facing two counts of felony DUI with great bodily injury. This was a case prosecuted in General Sessions. Each charge carried a maximum penalty of up to 10 years in the Department of Corrections. After review of the evidence and negotiations with the prosecutor the charges were reduced to a single ticket for reckless driving.

20 Year-Old Felony Arrest Warrant Our office was contacted by an individual now living several states away. He had recently learned that an arrest warrant had been issued for him in Lexington County over twenty years ago. Arrest warrants in South Carolina are not subject to any statute of limitations or expiration date. The warrant was for a felony charge. We hired an investigator to locate the original complainant regarding the warrant. After contacting that individual we were able to negotiate a resolution that involved payment of a restitution amount that resulted in the warrant being dismissed.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was arrested for 2nd degree domestic violence. This was a case prosecuted in General Sessions. The arrest came as a result of an argument he had with his pregnant wife. After being retained we conducted interviews of the witnesses and recommended our client voluntarily enter into a counseling program. As a result of completion all charges were dismissed.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our female client was arrested for DV 2 ^nd degree after an argument with her husband. This was a case prosecuted in General Sessions by the Solicitor’s office. After reviewing the government evidence in the case, all charges were dropped prior to trial.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was charged with DV 2 ^nd degree after the police alleged that the victim's nose was broken during an argument. DV 2 ^nd carries a possible prison sentence of up to three years. After voluntarily completing a domestic counseling program, and our case evaluation, the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the charge.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was arrested for 2nd degree domestic violence after an incident involving his wife. The circumstances of his arrest however seemed to stem more from his wife’s mental health condition rather than any criminal conduct. After raising this issue all charges were dismissed.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was a senior-citizen arrested for DV 2 ^nd degree after getting into an argument with her ex-husband. This was the first time she had ever, in her entire life, had ever been charged with a crime. She had a history of employment stability, and was really the type of person who you would never think would be arrested. But she found herself facing this serious General Sessions charge and up to three years in the South Carolina Department of Corrections. After a full review of the facts and circumstances, including using a private investigator to help document the true nature of events, all charges were ultimately dropped by the prosecutor.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was arrested for DV 2 ^nd degree in an incident involving his wife. He was offered to plead guilty to a lesser-3 ^rd degree charge. After notifying the General Sessions prosecutor that no plea bargain would be accepted the charge was ultimately reduced anyway and returned to a magistrate level court. After notifying that office that there would not be any plea the charge was dismissed.

2nd Degree Domestic Violence We represented a wife who was charged with domestic violence 2 ^nd degree after an incident involving her husband. This is a serious offense that was created by the 2015 South Carolina Domestic Violence Reform Act. Our client was facing a maximum three year prison sentence. After evaluation of the facts and circumstances of the case, and consultation with the prosecutor, the charge was dismissed.

2nd DUI Our client was charged with DUI 2 ^nd after going through a Highway Patrol checkpoint. He was facing up to one year in the Department of Corrections. Ultimately we were able to negotiate a reduction to reckless driving, and our client paid a $445 fine.

3rd Degree Criminal Defense We represented a man charged with Domestic Violence 3 ^rd degree in the Lexington County Magistrate Court. He was arrested after an ex-girlfriend alleged that he threatened to shoot her, and grabbed her leaving bruises on her arm and body. A jury trial was conducted by James Snell. After a nearly full-day of trial, including multiple witnesses for the prosecution and the defense, the jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

3rd Degree Domestic Violence Our client was arrested and charged with DV 3 ^rd. The allegation was that during an argument he had left bruises on his wife. The wife however gave multiple, differing accounts of what had happened. We notified the court and the prosecutor that our client would be pleading “not guilty.” On the day of the scheduled contested trial the charge was dismissed. As a result our client’s record is cleared, and he did not have to pay any fines or have any other requirements.

3rd Degree Domestic Violence We represented a 64 year old woman who was arrested with DV 3 ^rd degree after an argument with her husband. The arrest was made after her husband of almost 20 years called police to try to help settle her down after an argument. Due to “zero tolerance” policies though of the local police department they instead arrested her and took her to the county jail. The charge was ultimately dismissed prior to the case being called for trial.

3rd Offense Criminal Domestic Violence We were contacted on behalf of a client who was recently incarcerated on a failure to appear bench warrant related to a General Sessions level 3 ^rd Offense Criminal Domestic Violence offense. This is a felony and the maximum sentence is ten years imprisonment. The client was scheduled to remain incarcerated on the bench warrant until the conclusion of his case and any sentence that he might receive. After meeting with the client it was determined that there were special circumstances in his case that may render prosecution impractical. After we consulted with the prosecutor they agreed to lift the bench warrant and dismiss the criminal charge. This all occurred on the same day we were initially contacted.

4-Point Traffic Ticket Our client received a 4 point traffic ticket after being involved in a motor vehicle accident. After a hearing in the Traffic Court the client was found not guilty. Our client is not responsible for any court fine, and will not have any points assessed against their license.

9 Total Charges Our client was arrested after a traffic stop occurring on Highway 6 in the Red Bank community of Lexington County. He was charged with driving under suspension 3 ^rd, possession of controlled substance 3 ^rd, failure to stop for a blue light, driving left of center, simple possession of marijuana, operating uninured, improper passing, failure to signal, and not having a vehicle registration card. At the onset of being retained, Mr. Snell filed a specific objection pursuant to Rule 6 of the South Carolina Rules of Criminal Procedure to any drug test results being admitted in court without requiring all witnesses to testify. Due to this, and a personal issue involving one of the officers involved in the case, the General Sessions prosecutor eventually dismissed the charges pending in that court. The remaining charges remained pending in Magistrate Court. At the initial trial date the prosecuting officer moved for a continuance after he realized that there would not be a guilty plea stating that he needed additional time to prepare the case and obtain the necessary witnesses. The court granted this continuance request. The day before the next scheduled trial date the officer dismissed all remaining charges.

Armed Robbery Our client was charged with armed robbery and facing 10-30 years in prison. This was for a robbery occurring at a grocery store where a clerk gave money out of a cash register. After negotiations with the prosecutor he was allowed into the pre-trial intervention (PTI) program. After successfully completion all charges were dismissed.

Assault & Battery 3rd Degree Our client was arrested for Assault & Battery 3 ^rd Degree after an altercation with his neighbors. He retained our office prior to his first court date. We filed our initial discovery motions and notified the court that it would be a contested trial. Prior to the actual trial date the prosecutor elected to dismiss the charge.

Assault & Trespass A client was charged with assault and trespass in Lexington County following a dispute with a neighbor. She was acquitted of all charges after a jury trial.

Assault 3rd Degree Our client was charged with Assault 3 ^rd in the Lexington County Magistrate Court. Our client was charged after he pushed a man away who was arguing with his wife at his house. Prior to the call of the case attorney James Snell made a pre-trial motion to dismiss based on the Protection of Persons and Property Act. During a hearing on that motion the Court found by that our client was immune from criminal prosecution and dismissed the charge.

Assault 3rd Degree

Our client was charged with Assault 3^rd degree based on an allegation of assaulting a home health worker. On the day the case was scheduled for jury selection Mr. Snell appeared and advised the prosecutor that he was ready for trial. As a result the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case.

Assault 3rd Degree Client charged with Assault 3rd degree due to an alleged assault on a family member. Case dismissed by the prosecutor after a mistrial.

Assault 3rd Degree Our client was charged with Assault 3 ^rd Degree in the Orangeburg County Magistrate court. The case involved an allegation of relationship violence and both parties to the case had been charged. On the day of trial we notified the officer that our client and the other party involved would be refusing to testify pursuant to the 5 ^th Amendment. As a result there was no testimony available to be presented against our client and the court entered a verdict of not-guilty.

Assault 3rd Degree Our client was charged with Assault 3 ^rd degree in a case prosecuted in Lexington County Magistrate Court. The case involved a dispute involving his son. After filing and serving a request for trial and initial discovery motions, the arresting officer agreed to dismiss the case prior to trial.

Assault and Battery We represented a Chapin area man who was arrested for Assault and Battery based on accusations made by a neighbor. We notified the court that we were fully contesting the charge, and that he would not be accepting any plea bargain. A jury trial was held in the Lexington County Magistrate Court. The allegation was that he had assaulted a neighbor woman by pushing her down. Her husband testified that he was a witness to the assault. The trial was conducted by James Snell. On cross-examination he pointed out how the accusers had been inconsistent with their story and provided inaccurate evidence. During closing he argued self-defense, in that the neighbor had come onto our client’s property and initiated the conflict. The jury returned a verdict of not-guilty. As a result this charge will be erased from our client’s record.

Assault and Battery 3rd Degree Our client was arrested and charged with Assault and Battery 3 ^rd Degree in violation of S.C. Code § 16-3-600. The charge stemmed from an incident with a woman in his home who had consumed alcohol, prescription drugs, and marijuana. At a jury trial conducted in the Lexington County Magistrate Court, Mr. Snell argued that she was over-exaggerating her injuries, manipulated photographic evidence, and that our client's conduct was lawful self-defense. The jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

Assault and Battery 3rd Degree Our client was charged with Assault and Battery 3 ^rd Degree after an alleged incident involving a neighbor. We notified the court that the case was fully contested. During two pre-trial hearings the government notified the court that they intended on prosecuting the case. On the day of trial, which was approximately two years after the arrest, the government agreed to a dismissal of the charge. The court dismissed the charge and advised the neighbors to try to be more neighborly.

Assaulting a Jail Guard Client was charged with assaulting a jail guard. After obtaining a report on his psychological condition all charges were dismissed.

Assaulting Daughter Client was arrested and tried for physically assaulting her minor daughter. After Mr. Snell requested that the judge instruct the jury on corporal punishment as a legal defense, the jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

Attempted Murder

Our client was arrested for attempted murder after an alleged stabbing. Initially, bond was denied by the magistrate. Mr. Snell was able to obtain a bond for our client after filing a motion in General Sessions. This allowed our client to be released from the county jail. Ultimately, the attempted murder case was dismissed by the state prior to trial.

Bench Warrant We were hired to represent a client who was incarcerated on a bench warrant. She potentially could have been held in jail for months or longer while her case was waiting to be resolved. After notifying the prosecutor's office of our involvement we were able to obtain an agreement to bring her to court that same week. Once in Court she was represented by Mr. Snell who explained her circumstances to the judge who imposed a time-served sentence. Although she was facing up to six months, she was released with no additional jail, probation, or fine assessed.

Boating Under the Influence (BUI) Client was charged with Boating Under the Influence (BUI) after being stopped on Lake Murray by officers with the South Carolina Department of Natural Resources. The client was found "not guilty" after a trial.

Burglary and Malicious Injury to Property

Our client was charged with two felony charges of burglary and malicious injury to property. A former co-worker alleged that someone broke into his garage and damaged his property and stole some items. A neighbor claimed to be an eyewitness. The missing items were found in the possession of our client. As a result our client was arrested and charged with these serious offenses. We conducted a defense investigation and learned that the items claimed to have been stolen were in fact in our client’s possession for more than one year prior to the supposed burglary. After raising this, and other inconsistencies, all charges were dismissed.

CDV Our client was charged with CDV after an incident involving her husband. The case was dismissed during an in-court proceeding.

CDV Mr. Snell's client was charged with criminal domestic violence 1 ^st offense. The case was subsequently referred to the South Carolina Attorney General's office for prosecution. A jury trial was held. The witnesses for the State included one of the arresting officers and the client's spouse. After considering Mr. Snell's closing arguments, the jury returned a verdict of not-guilty. As a result our client did not have to pay any fine, submit to any counseling, be sentenced to any jail time, and will have the record of this event expunged.

CDV Our client was charged with CDV after an argument with his wife. It began after she had come back from a bar intoxicated. Although our client was the one who called "911" for assistance in trying to settle her down, he was arrested after his wife claimed that he had pushed her. After a jury trial where we were able to introduce evidence of the wife's intoxication our client was found not-guilty.

CDV Our client was charged with CDV after an argument with her live-in boyfriend of several years. He claimed that she had slapped him. After a trial our client was found not-guilty.

CDV Our client was arrested for CDV based on allegations made by her husband. His report to the police came after a fight over the contents and possession of a cell phone. Ultimately the prosecutor elected to dismiss the charge prior to it being called for trial.

CDV Client was charged with criminal domestic violence (CDV) for an argument with his wife. The allegations included throwing beer cans and pushing her downstairs. After a jury trial he was acquitted.

CDV Client was charged with criminal domestic violence after having an argument with his wife. Although there was an arrest warrant issued, the factual allegations in the warrant failed to state the required legal elements of CDV. After a pre-trial motion made by Mr. Snell the Court agreed and dismissed the charge.

CDV Our client was charged with CDV after an incident involving her husband. After a review of the case we were able to negotiate an in-court dismissal of the CDV.

CDV Client was charged in Magistrate Court with 1st offense criminal domestic violence. The allegations included fighting both with the wife and another man. On the day of trial the charge was dismissed.

CDV A female client was charged with criminal domestic violence for allegedly assaulting her boyfriend. She was acquitted of all charges after a jury trial.

CDV Our client was arrested and charged with 1st offense criminal domestic violence. Three witnesses testified for the State, including the responding police officers and the alleged victim. The jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

CDV 1st Client was charged with CDV 1 ^st after an argument with her husband. At the call of the case the court granted Mr. Snell's request to have the charge dismissed. As a result our client did not pay any fines or court costs, receive any jail sentence, or have to do counseling. Additionally our client's request will be automatically cleared by the court at no further expense to her.

CDV 1st Degree At a pre-trial conference during court our client's CDV 1 ^st charge was dismissed due to considerations of the exact nature and circumstances of our client's arrest.

CDV 1st Degree Our client was charged with CDV 1 ^st by the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Department. The charge was ultimately dismissed and our client is now eligible to have his record expunged.

CDV 1st Degree Our client was charged with CDV 1 ^st after his ex-girlfriend came to his home and found him with another woman. After raising numerous issues, including the lack of household member standing with the prosecutor, the case was completely dismissed in open court.

CDV 1st Degree Client was charged with CDV 1 ^st in the Town of Lexington. After voluntarily completing a serious of domestic abuse counseling classes the charge was dismissed and the client's arrest record was expunged.

CDV 1st Degree At a pre-trial conference during court our client's CDV 1 ^st charge was dismissed due to considerations of our client's advanced age and health status.

CDV 1st Degree Client was charged with criminal domestic violence (CDV 1 ^st). He hired Mr. Snell after coming into the office for a free initial consultation. After being retained, Mr. Snell filed a request for a comprehensive jury trial, and discovery motions pursuant to the South Carolina Rules of Criminal Procedure. Prior to the case being scheduled, the charge was dismissed after discussions between Mr. Snell and the prosecutor that occurred in the courtroom during a pre-trial conference.

CDV 1st Degree Client was charged with CDV 1st for an incident involving her husband. After trial she was found not-guilty.

CDV 1st Degree Client was charged with CDV 1st for allegedly striking his live in girlfriend. Photographs and witness statements established minor physical injuries. The client was allowed to enroll in the PTI program which resulted in the CDV being dismissed and his record expunged.

CDV 1st Degree Our client was charged with CDV 1 ^st in Richland County. On the day of trial the Court granted a motion to dismiss made by James Snell. Our client's record will be automatically expunged by the court.

Commercial Driver Accident Our client was a professional truck driver holding a CDL license. He was involved in a "right turn" accident and cited by the Highway Patrol. At a jury trial held before the Lexington County Magistrate Court he was found not-guilty. As a result there are no points assessed against his license and he did not have to pay any court fees or fines.

Criminal Domestic Violence 1st Degree Our client was charged with Criminal Domestic Violence 1 ^st Degree in Columbia, South Carolina. At the call of the case the court granted our motion to dismiss. Our client was not required to pay any fines, attend any counseling, or serve any jail time. His arrest record will be expunged automatically by the court for no charge to our client.

Criminal Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN) Our client was arrested and charged with Criminal Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN), pointing and presenting a firearm, and possession of a firearm by a convicted violent felon. He was charged after getting into an argument with his girlfriend in which her children claimed that he had made threatening statements while holding a firearm. Due to the serious nature of this offense (our client was facing a minimum mandatory prison sentence), we recommended a thorough defense investigation be conducted. Working in conjunction with an investigator it was determined that our client was in fact not guilty of any crime at all. As a result, and due in large part with our client's own cooperation with the defense strategy we set forth, all charges were dismissed pre-trial.

Criminal Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN)

Our client was charged with Criminal Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN). She was facing a minimum sentence of one year in prison as a result of the seriousness of the charge. Our client followed our recommendations and allowed us to voluntarily enroll her in a domestic abuse counseling program. As a result, and after full evaluation of the case, the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the case.

Criminal Sexual Conduct We represented an adult woman charged with criminal sexual conduct based on an alleged sexual encounter involving an underage boy. She was facing a sentence of up to fifteen years in prison and mandatory registration as a sex offender. After review of the we discovered indications the story was manufactured. After discussions with the prosecutor all charges were dismissed prior to trial.

Criminal Sexual Conduct (Rape) Our client was charged with Criminal Sexual Conduct (rape) regarding an alleged assault against an ex-girlfriend. Although our client attempted to cooperate with the police investigators before he contacted our office, he was unsuccessful in dissuading them from charging him. He was arrested out of state and spent over three weeks in custody (without a bond hearing) to be extradited back to South Carolina. It was during this time period that the Law Office of James R. Snell, Jr., LLC, was retained. The very next day that we were hired our investigator flew over 900 miles from the Columbia airport to meet with our client in the out of state jail. We also ordered relevant police reports. After evaluating the case we determined that there was insufficient evidence support the charge. After consultation with the prosecutor's office they agreed, which resulted in a total dismissal of our client's charges. This was a very significant result for our client as the dismissal saved him from possible lengthy prison sentence and sex-offender registration.

Criminal Sexual Conduct with a Minor Our client was arrested for Criminal Sexual Conduct with a Minor after an allegation of performing a sexual act upon a young child. After investigating the circumstances Mr. Snell uncovered numerous inconsistencies. Plea offers were rejected and the prosecution was notified that we were prepared to try the case. Prior to actually calling the case for trial the prosecutor elected to dismiss all charges.

Criminal Sexual Conduct with a Minor Client was charged with criminal sexual conduct with a minor and was facing up to twenty years in prison and entrance onto the sex offender registry. The prosecutor initially offered a plea carrying up to fifteen years in prison. After obtaining a report of his mental state criminal charges were dismissed. He was referred for psychiatric treatment and then subsequently released to his family.

Criminal Speeding Our client was charged with criminal speeding for going 86\60 MPH zone. Mr. Snell was able to obtain an agreement from the prosecuting officer to lower the charge to 64\60, saving our clients hundreds of dollars in fine money and potentially thousands in insurance rate increases.

Criminal Speeding We represented a client charged with 90 M.P.H. in a 60 M.P.H. zone. At 30 M.P.H. over the speed limit, this is the most serious type of speeding charge in South Carolina. Our client was facing a license suspension in addition to a fine, points, and an increase in car insurance rates. After negotiation with the officer the ticket was ultimately reduced to a 2 point ticket. This saved our client a substantial portion of the fine and car insurance rate increase, and also avoided the suspension.

Cruelty to Children Our client was arrested and charged with cruelty to children. This was after a report was made that a child had been struck with a belt. On the day of trial, after we notified the prosecutor that we were objecting to their planned evidence, the case was ultimately dismissed.

Cruelty to Children We represented a mother and father who had both been arrested and charged with Cruelty to Children by the Lexington County Sheriff's Department. After the conclusion of the state's case during a jury trial the court granted Mr. Snell's motion for a directed verdict of not-guilty. This resulted in the charges against both defendants being dismissed, and their records will be automatically expunged.

Discharging a Firearm into a Dwelling We were retained to represent a client who was charged with discharging a firearm into a dwelling. This is a serious felony, carrying a possible sentence of up to ten years in prison. Our review of the case indicated that although a gun did discharge into a residence, it was not under circumstances indicating an intent to threaten or injury anyone. Ultimately the prosecutor agreed to reduce the charge to a misdemeanor disorderly conduct, and our client's sentence was reduced to a small fine.

Disorderly Conduct Our college aged client was arrested for disorderly conduct after a noise complaint at his apartment complex. Charge dismissed by the prosecutor prior to trial.

Disorderly Conduct Client was charged with disorderly conduct. A jury trial was held in which the two witnesses for the State were responding police officers. The jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

Disorderly Conduct, Simple Assault, Trespassing, and Resisting Arrest We represented a college-age man who was arrested in Five Points and charged with disorderly conduct, simple assault, trespassing, and resisting arrest. All charges dismissed prior to trial.

Disregarding a Traffic Control Device Our client was charged with disregarding a traffic control device, which is a 4 point traffic ticket. This was after a minor car accident at an intersection. After discussions with the prosecuting officer on the day of trial the charge was dismissed.

Domestic Violence

We represented a woman charged with domestic violence after she called the police for help during an argument with her husband. We obtained copies of her call for help, incident report, and police body-cam footage as part of the court's discovery process. After a review, we determined that the police had failed to properly investigate the situation. After sharing our findings with the prosecutor, the charge was dismissed.

Domestic Violence

We represented a woman who was arrested for DV 3rd after admitting to striking her husband. Initially, he was non-cooperative with the defense. A no-contact condition was imposed by the court. A few weeks later the husband wanted to reconcile and contacted our office. We were then able to obtain a court order removing the no-contact bond restrictions. Based on the totality of the circumstances we recommended that our client voluntarily participate in a counseling program. Ultimately the case was dismissed by the prosecutor prior to it being scheduled for trial.

Domestic Violence

We represented a young college-graduate who had been arrested for DV 3rd degree. Our investigation into the circumstances showed that the police had arrested the wrong person. After conferring with the prosecutor and sharing our concerns the charge was dismissed.

Domestic Violence

A husband became concerned about messages and photographs that he believed his wife was sending other men on her phone. After confronting her with information about his suspicions they got into a physical argument over possession of the phone. During the police investigation it was unclear if any charges would be brought, and if so, who would be arrested. Ultimately the husband was arrested, and retained our office. On the day of the scheduled trial date the charge against him was completely dismissed. He did not have to pay any fines, fees, or court costs.

Domestic Violence Mr. Snell was contacted by an individual who currently had two outstanding arrest warrants. One was for a CDV case in which he had already plead guilty (he had gone to court without an attorney), and he was unable to successfully complete the court ordered counseling program. The other was for a new CDV case. After being retained Mr. Snell arranged for the court to hold a hearing on the bench warrant. At that hearing the court allowed him a second chance at completing the counseling program, dismissing the arrest warrant. Several months later, after having successfully completing counseling, the remaining CDV charge was completely dismissed.

Domestic Violence Our client was schedule to complete a term of probation when he was charged with domestic violence. This is significant, because a CDV arrest can result in probation being violated. After voluntarily enrolling and completing a counseling program the judge and prosecutor both agreed to dismiss the charge.

Domestic Violence Our client was charged with CDV after an incident involving a former boyfriend. On the day of court the charge was dismissed.

Domestic Violence

We represented a man with a significant prior criminal record. He was arrested for domestic violence after an altercation with his wife. Both had been drinking. We began by obtaining copies of the relevant police reports and witness statements. After discussing with the prosecutor how it appeared that the wife was an aggressor, the domestic violence charge was reduced to disorderly conduct with a $100 fine.

Domestic Violence James Snell was retained by a young man who had been arrested for domestic violence. He had asked for a jury trial on his own, but then moved without properly notifying the court of his new address. His case was brought to trial in his absence and he was convicted. Mr. Snell filed a motion to re-open which was granted by the court. Then, after having a new trial scheduled the case was eventually dismissed by the prosecutor. As a result our client’s record is expunged, and he no longer has to worry about this charge negatively affecting his future.

Domestic Violence Our client had an argument with his girlfriend. Police were called to help defuse the situation. The police announced though they were going to make an arrest, which took them both by surprise. James Snell was contacted in time to be at the original bond setting, and the client was allowed to sign himself out of jail and the judge did not impose a “no contact” order. At the call of the case after the alleged victim notified the prosecutor that she did not want to prosecute the court dismissed the case.

Domestic Violence Our client was a wife and mother of three who was arrested after her soon-to-be ex-husband accused of slapping him after an argument over his infidelity. We began by notifying the court and prosecutor that we were fully contesting the charge. We then obtained prior police reports to show the alleged victim’s history of not only assaulting his wife, but also trying to use law enforcement as a weapon against her. As a result the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the charge. Our client now has a clean record and was able to keep her employment.

Domestic Violence Our client was employed as a deputy with a local Sheriff’s Department. He was arrested after his wife reported he assaulted her during an argument. After a full day of trial the jury returned a verdict of not-guilty.

Domestic Violence Our client was a young veteran who, like many other returning soldiers, had found himself caught up in the criminal justice system. After voluntarily enrolling and completing a counseling program the judge and prosecutor agreed to dismiss his domestic violence charge.

Domestic Violence

Attorney James R. Snell, Jr., obtained a trial verdict of "not-guilty" on behalf of a client charged with criminal domestic violence. Our client was separated from his wife. It was reported to law enforcement that he had followed her in traffic and then pulled into a parking lot. While there it was claimed that he had gotten out of his car, hit the windows, tried to open the doors, and had threatened to beat her. The law enforcement investigator testified that it was an "easy" case.

During cross-examination of the state's witnesses, Mr. Snell had the wife expound on the incident bringing out the allegation that he was yelling and acting in a very aggressive manner (Mr. Snell believes that sometimes by "helping" the complaining witness make the story bigger it shows a lack of credibility). Although a police officer actually rode by parking lot while the parties were there he did not notice any criminal activity. The officer testified on cross that he would have intervened had he heard yelling or seen that type of commotion. A defense witness testified that he was in the car with the Defendant and that he engaged in no violent or inappropriate conduct. In closing argument Mr. Snell submitted to the jury that the lack of any corroborating evidence at all combined with the possible motivation to make up a false allegation to try to gain an advantage in a family court case, justified a not-guilty verdict. After a brief deliberation the jury did return a verdict of not-guilty.

In addition to the domestic violence charge our client was also charged with violating the no-contact provisions of a previously issued Family Court order. As our client was present with his wife the jury did find him in violation of the no-contact provisions of that prior court order and he was required to pay a fine for that violation.

The end result was that the jury found our client not-guilty of the criminal domestic violence offense, even after finding that an order of protection was in effect and had been violated. Because the CDV charge was dismissed by the jury, our client did not face any sentencing for it, and that arrest will be automatically expunged from his record.

Domestic Violence Client was arrested for criminal domestic violence by the City of Columbia Police Department. He went to his court date before consulting with a lawyer and attempted to represent himself. After pleading not guilty, he was convicted by a judge. Mr. Snell was able to have this client's conviction reversed after filing for Post-Conviction Relief (PCR) based on grounds that the Municipal Court failed to adequately advise the client of his right to an attorney or a jury trial. This decision to grant PCR was appealed by the South Carolina Attorney General's Office to the South Carolina Supreme Court. After remitting the matter the Court of Appeals, the State was not permitted to appeal, affirming the PCR victory.

Domestic Violence

Our client was arrested for assault 3^rd degree after his girlfriend reported a physical altercation to law enforcement. This was considered relationship violence and prosecuted by the local domestic violence prosecutor. We declined to accept any plea offer and demanded a contested trial. Prior to the case being tried the charge was dismissed.

Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN) Our client was charged with Criminal Domestic Violence of a High and Aggravated Nature (DVHAN) in Richland County. This was a very serious case where our client's use of a bladed weapon during an argument lead to the other party requiring medical attention. Our client followed our advice, and voluntarily participated in a counseling program before going to court. Ultimate result was that a DVHAN charge that carried a minimum prison sentence was reduced to a misdemeanor level charge and our client received a short probationary sentence.

Driving Under Suspension Our client was charged with Driving Under Suspension (DUS). All charges were dismissed pre-trial.

Driving Under Suspension Client charged with driving under suspension. At a bench trial the client was acquitted of the charge after the police were unable to establish that the DMV had timely served the notice of suspension on the defendant.

Driving Under Suspension 2nd Offense and Improper Backing Our client was charged with Driving Under Suspension 2 ^nd Offense and Improper Backing. He was faxing up to 90 days in jail, or a fine of over $1,500. On the day of trial, and after our motion to dismiss the charge or suppress the evidence, the judge excluded evidence related to the driving under suspension charge. As a result that charge was dismissed and our client was only required to pay a fine of $237.50.

Driving Under Suspension, 3rd Offense

We represented a driving charged with driving under suspension 3rd offense. This carries a mandatory jail sentence. In addition there were several other charges including operating uninsured, no registration, and an improper vehicle license (no tag). We notified the court and prosecutor that we would be fully contesting all charges. Prior to the case the prosecutor agreed to dismiss all charges.

Drug Trafficking Our client was charged with drug trafficking after being stopped on the Interstate for speeding. After being retained we immediately began on the case by obtaining copies of the police report and filing a motion for discovery including the drug chain of custody documentation. After reviewing the case we uncovered several facts calling into question whether or not the initial police stop was proper, and whether or not the police had probable cause to search the car. After notifying the prosecutor of these issues the charges were reduced from trafficking (minimum of 10 years) to a misdemeanor possession. This saved our client from a felony conviction, along with thousands in fines, and potentially a decade or more in prison.

DUI

Our client was charged with DUI and his case was referred to the Richland County Central Magistrate Court. He had been charged after being observed driving over the center line, and then providing a 0.15 BAC breath sample. While this case was pending our client received another DUI in a different location. Prior to the Richland County case being called for trial we were able to negotiate a reduction to reckless driving.

DUI

We represented a young man charged with DUI. The arrest came after a member of the public called police to report unsafe driving. When the police contacted our client they reported that he had signs and symptoms of drug use, and needle tracks on his arm. Our client was offered a plea to reckless driving which was turned down. On the day of court the prosecutor called the case for trial. After hearing the legal arguments and objections made by our attorney, the DUI was dismissed.

DUI Client was charged with DUI in Richland County. After Mr. Snell discovered a serious issue with the State's case, the charge was dismissed.

DUI Client was charged with driving under the influence (DUI) after being involved in a single car accident. Charges were reduced to reckless driving pre-trial.

DUI

Richland County DUI charge was dismissed by the Court. Our client did not plead guilty to anything, did not remit a fine, and will have no points assessed against his license.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI. She admitted to drinking, took field sobriety tests, and provided a breath sample of 0.10. The DUI charge was reduced to reckless driving with a reduced fine (under $100).

DUI Mr. Snell's client was charged with DUI. Mr. Snell's review of the case indicated that the client should not have been arrested. End result was the DUI was dismissed with no plea bargain or concession on the client's part.

DUI Mr. Snell's client was charged with DUI in August, 2014, and submitted a breath sample. After negotiations the DUI was dismissed and the client plead guilty to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI in July, 2014, after going through a police checkpoint and then completing field sobriety tests. After negotiations the DUI was dismissed and the client plead guilty to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI and submitted a breath sample of 0.18. The DUI was dismissed, and client plead guilty to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI and submitted a breath sample of 0.14. The DUI was dismissed, and client plead guilty to reckless driving.

DUI

Our client was stopped for speeding shortly before midnight. He admitted to leaving a bar\restaurant and drinking beer. Per the officer’s report he did poorly on the full battery of standardized field sobriety tests. After being retained we notified the court that we were fully contesting the charge. We obtained the roadside video and the officer’s narrative incident report, and the officer’s score sheet from the field sobriety tests. Our review indicated multiple defects and inconsistencies in the case. As a result the charge was reduced to reckless driving prior to trial.

DUI

Our client was stopped after 1:00 A.M. for following another vehicle too closely and weaving. The officer claimed to observe several unopened beer cans in the vehicle. Our client also admitted to having drunk beers earlier. The officer reported that our client did poorly on field sobriety tests administered prior to making the arrest for DUI. A breathalyzer test was administered at the jail at a 0.09 level. After reviewing the evidence and noting problems in the police officer’s case, the charge was reduced to reckless driving prior to trial.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI 1 ^st and provided a breath sample of 0.20. The charge was negotiated to a reckless driving.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI after going through a Lexington County checkpoint. He participated in field sobriety tests, and admitted to having had beer with a recent meal. He refused the breathalyzer. The DUI charge was dismissed in exchange for a plea to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI after a single car accident and subsequently admitting to having had 4 or 5 drinks. The DUI was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI in Columbia, SC. This was after a late-night incident where the client's car rolled off of an embankment in a parking lot. The charge was dismissed.

DUI Client was arrested for DUI in Orangeburg County. After law enforcement failed to respond to our requests for copies of the evidence in the case the charge was dismissed.

Driving Under the Influence (DUI)

Our client was pulled over late-night\early-morning for speeding. He admitted to drinking, and attempted field sobriety tests. According to the officer he showed multiple indicates of impairment on those tests and was arrested for drunk driving. At the police station he refused a breath test. After a full-day trial, our client was found not-guilty. As a result his record is expunged, and he did not have to pay any fine or lose his driver’s license.

DUI

Our client was a college-aged driver who was charged with DUI after a late-night incident involving running his car off of the road and striking a fire hydrant. Water shot up in the air. He admitted drinking, performed field sobriety tests, and provided a breath BAC score of 0.17. This appeared to be an impossible DUI case. However after fully evaluating the case, we discovered that there were in fact significant defenses that could be raised. After discussions with the prosecutor the DUI was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI

We represented a driver who was arrested after he was found on the side of the road with his car running. An open bottle of alcohol was also found in the vehicle. He provided a breath BAC score of 0.16. After fully evaluating the evidence we learned that there was a significant challenge to the DUI. As a result prosecutor agreed to reduce the charge to public disorderly conduct.

DUI

Our client was charged with DUI and provided a breath sample of 0.09. This was a case pending in a Lexington County municipal court. Prior to the court date the police department was unwilling to offer any reductions to the charge. We notified them that we would be fully contesting the case in court and had the court schedule a trial date. After we had prepared the case for court they agreed to dismiss the DUI and offer a plea to reckless driving.

We represented a man arrested for DUI after the police found him asleep in a car that had run off of the road and up into a ditch. According to the police he smelled like alcohol and showed other signs of impairment. Prior to trial we negotiated a reduction to too fast for conditions (a type of speeding ticket). The DUI was dismissed and erased from our client’s record.

DUI James Snell obtained a not-guilty verdict on a DUI prosecuted in the Irmo Municipal Court. Our client was pulled over after 3:00 A.M. after being observed driving in the wrong lane. Upon questioning there was an admission at having some alcohol, and the breathalyzer test was refused. Mr. Snell argued to the jury that such a substantial driving error would, if related to intoxication, be substantial intoxication. But the evidence presented didn't show that, and instead the driver was simply tired and also sick. After deliberations the jury found our client not-guilty. As a result there was no fine, no points, no DUI suspension, SR-22 insurance, interlock device, or other penalty imposed.

DUI Our client was observed driving his car off of the side of the road. Field sobriety tests were administered that he allegedly failed. After being arrested for DUI he provided a breath sample at 0.18. After review of the evidence, and negotiation with the prosecutor, the charge was ultimately amended to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was stopped on the Interstate for driving over 100 M.P.H. The police officer noticed open beers in the vehicle and our client admitted to drinking. Field sobriety tests were administered and the officer reported that our client "failed." After reviewing the evidence of the case our lawyers determined that the field sobriety tests were not properly administered or scored. Although our client refused the breathalyzer, that suspension was also dismissed by the Office of Motor Vehicle Hearings prior to the trial date. On the day of trial the DUI was reduced to reckless driving. Our client paid a fine to the court for the reckless driving and open container. He was not required to enroll in ADSAP, obtain SR-22 insurance, or have any license suspension.

DUI Our client was involved in a single car accident. When the police responded they reported the odor of alcohol and that he had performed poorly on all standard field sobriety tests. He was arrested for DUI. At the jail he provided a breath sample of 0.14. After identifying potential legal issues with the case he was allowed to plead to reckless driving. The DUI was dismissed.

DUI Our client was pulled over for speeding. When the officer approached the vehicle he believed that the driver smelled like alcohol, and additionally was lethargic indicating drug impairment. The driver did admit to taking some prescription medication and to having drunk the night before. After being arrested he provided a breath sample of 0.05. The DUI charge was resolved through a plea to speeding.

DUI We obtained a pre-trial dismissal on behalf of a client who was arrested for DUI near Columbia, South Carolina. Our client was parked on the side of the road with a flat tire. This case was dismissed after Mr. Snell raised the availability of a defense based on an absence of evidence that the defendant had put the vehicle into motion while under the influence of alcohol.

DUI Our client was arrested at a vehicle license checkpoint for driving under the influence. Prior to the case being called for trial the charge was reduced to public disorderly conduct.

DUI Our client was arrested for a marijuana induced DUI. After a review of the evidence in the case and negotiation with the prosecutor the charge was amended to a speeding ticket.

DUI Our client was arrested on I-20 and charged with DUI. The charge was based on the our client's driving combined with admissions of prescription drug use. Prior to trial the DUI was amended to a reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI 1 ^st and submitted a 0.18 breath sample. Our investigation indicated errors in the police officer's investigation and handling of the case. As a result the prosecutor agreed to reduce the charge to reckless driving.

DUI Client was arrested for DUI. After submitting a 0.00 breath sample the DUI case continued based on suspicion of drug impairment. Documents produced pursuant to our discovery motions indicated that there were no drugs in our client's system. As a result the DUI was dismissed prior to trial.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI after being stopped for speeding. After our review of the evidence and pointing out shortcomings in the case with the prosecutor all charges were dismissed prior to trial.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI after being found asleep in a car parked in the road. The DUI was dismissed in exchange for the client's plea to disorderly conduct. Since this was not a moving offense, no points were assessed, there was no license suspension, and no requirement of SR-22 insurance.

DUI

Our client was charged with DUI at a 0.13 BAC level. The charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI after his vehicle left the roadway and entered a ditch. The charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was arrested in the City of Columbia for DUI after he confessed to the officer that he had taken prescription medication. After negotiations the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the DUI in exchange for a plea to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI after being stopped at a Highway Patrol checkpoint. Negotiated reduction to reckless driving.

DUI Lexington County client charged with DUI. Client submitted a breath same and registered a 0.20 BAC, which is substantially higher than the 0.08 guideline standard. After a review of the case James Snell found that the arresting office had not fully complied with mandatory arrest procedures. As a result of this review he was able to negotiate a dismissal of the DUI in exchange for a plea to reckless driving.

DUI Client was charged with DUI. After a pre-trial motion was made by Mr. Snell due to a violation of the State DUI statute by the arresting officer (failure to videotape the field sobriety tests) the charge was dismissed.

DUI Our client was pulled over after a police officer observed him speeding. He admitted to drinking a beer at a local bar, and then attempted field sobriety tests. At the police station our client submitted a breathalyzer reading of 0.12. After a review of the evidence and discussion with the prosecutor the charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client caught the attention of law enforcement after spinning his tires in a bar parking lot. He was pulled over in an adjoining parking lot. He admitted to drinking beer, and then attempted field sobriety tests. After being arrested for DUI was provided a breath sample of 0.18. After retaining our office we field the necessary paperwork to help him challenge both the implied consent suspension as well as the criminal DUI offense. The charge was completely dismissed.

DUI Our client was arrested and charged with DUI after running a stop light. The charge was completely dismissed prior to trial.

DUI Our client was arrested on I-20 and charged with DUI. Our client was pulled over for allegedly swerving out of his lane. Prior to the trial the DUI was amended to a regular traffic ticket for too fast for conditions.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI in Richland County. This was especially concerning for him because he had plans on obtaining his CDL and becoming a professional truck driver. On the day of his scheduled trial the case was dismissed. As a result his record will be expunged and he is now eligible to earn his CDL.

DUI The client was charged with DUI and DUS after going through a checkpoint. After negotiations the DUI was dismissed and the client plead guilty to DUS only.

DUI Our client was charged with an ABC violation (open container of liquor) and with DUI. After being arrested he provided a breath sample of 0.09. On the day of trial the judge granted our motion to dismiss due to a failure of the state to be able to maintain or provide discovery materials.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI and submitted to a breath test registered a 0.10. Our investigation into the facts of our client's arrest indicated that there may have been an issue with whether or not the police officer had legal justification to initially pull our client over. Prior to trial James Snell negotiated a reduction to reckless driving with the prosecutor.

DUI Our client was arrested for driving under the influence. He provided a breath sample that came back at 0.20. This is a very high result, and subjected him to the maximum penalties under South Carolina law for a first offense. After negotiations with the prosecutor concerning legal and other issues involved in the case we were able to negotiate a reduction to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI 1 ^st by the Richland County Highway Patrol. After presenting the prosecutor with documentation regarding our client's health condition the charge was dismissed prior to trial.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI 1 ^st in Lexington County. After discussions with the prosecutor the charge was dismissed prior to trial.

DUI Client charged with DUI 1 ^st, Driving Under Suspension 3 ^rd, and Open Container. Our client plead to reckless driving, all other charges dismissed.

DUI Client charged with DUI 1 ^st. Client was allowed to plead guilty to a speeding ticket and remit a fine.

DUI We represented a member of the military who was stopped for speeding. After the officer learned the man had been drinking the night before he asked him to perform field sobriety tests. The officer made an arrest for DUI after feeling that the tests were “failed”. At the jail, the man voluntarily provided a breath sample registering blood alcohol of 0.13%. After substantial negotiations with the prosecution, the charge was reduced to reckless driving. This will allow our client to remain in the military.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI, Driving Too Fast for Conditions and Open Container. After notifying the prosecutor that the case was a trial, the DUI was dismissed in exchange for a plea to Open Container and Driving Too Fast for Conditions.

DUI We represented a driver who was stopped outside of Columbia, South Carolina, after "cutting off" a police officer. According to the officer the driver admitted to drinking, and stumbled upon exiting his car. He was then arrested for DUI. After taking the case we learned that the police officer failed to properly preserve the evidence. As a result we were able to negotiate a resolution to an ordinary traffic ticket for an improper lane change. The DUI was dismissed and removed from our client's record.

DUI James R. Snell, Jr., represented a client who had been arrested by police officers in a city adjacent to Columbia, South Carolina. The client was charged with DUI after going through a police checkpoint and then telling the police that he had been drinking beer. Initially the prosecutor said “no offer” and refused to reduce the charge. After evaluating the case and alerting the prosecutor to several potential legal issues, they relented and extended an offer of reckless driving. As a result our client’s DUI arrest record is erased, and there is no requirement to complete ADSAP or install an ignition interlock device.

DUI James Snell represented a young man who was stopped by a police officer after leaving a bar in the early morning hours. A review of the evidence showed that there were significant weaknesses in the facts alleged by the police officer to justify his assumption of impairment. After bringing these issues up to the prosecution, the DUI was ultimately reduced to a speeding ticket. As a result there is no DUI conviction, no ADSAP, no SR-22 insurance, no interlock requirement and no license suspension.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI after his car was seen swerving all over the road prior to rolling over in a ditch. A blood test showed a blood alcohol level of over 0.16, putting the case in the highest category of DUI in South Carolina. We defended the case by notifying the court and prosecution that the charges were fully contested, and we objected to the introduction of the blood test. The charge was dismissed prior to trial.

DUI We defended a client charged with DUI, open container and other related charges. A police “drug recognition expert” determined that our client was impaired by marijuana, and a drug test showed marijuana and other drugs in our client’s system. The DUI charge was reduced to reckless driving, a minor in possession of alcohol charge was sent to the alcohol education program. Other charges were dismissed. This will result in our client having a clean criminal record and a second chance at a fully productive life.

DUI Our client was stopped after other drivers reported seeing his vehicle swerve. After being pulled over he was arrested and charged with DUI. After being arrested he provided a breath sample of 0.18. The DUI charge was resolved through a plea to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI after being pulled over for allegedly crossing over the fog line. In addition our client admitted to having consumed some alcohol and provided a breath sample of 0.11. Prior to trial the DUI was dismissed and our client was allowed to plea to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was involved in an incident where his vehicle ran off the road and into a ditch. After being arrested for DUI he was taken the hospital for an alcohol blood test. The result of that test indicated a blood alcohol level of 0.11. Prior to the case being called for trial the charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI and submitted a breath sample of 0.34. After being retained our office filed a notice with the court that we were fully contesting the charge and also submitted discovery motions. Prior to the call of the case for trial the state's main witness was no longer available to testify, and the state would not have been able to proceed over our objections. As a result the charge was dismissed.

DUI Our client was a nursing student charged with DUI. She provided a breath sample of 0.17 (putting her in the highest category of DUI 1 ^st cases). It was important for her to avoid a DUI conviction since she was attempting to get into a competitive nursing program. After review of her case and finding some potential issues and discussions with the prosecutor she was allowed to enter a plea to a reduced charge of reckless driving.

DUI Our client was arrested for DUI after being stopped at a police checkpoint. At the police station he submitted to a breath test and blew a 0.10. After discussing issues related to the checkpoint and the police procedure with the prosecutor, the charge was reduced to a too fast for conditions traffic ticket.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI after being observed driving the wrong way on the interstate. A 0.20 breath sample was provided, making the case prosecuted at the highest level for DUI 1 ^st in South Carolina. After plea negotiations, the client's charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was charged with DUI and Speeding and refused the breath test procedure. After plea negotiations he was allowed to enter a plea to the speeding violation, resulting in a dismissal of the DUI charge.

DUI Our client was stopped for DUI after another driver reported alleged erratic driving. After being arrested he was taken to the police station where he provided a 0.18 breath sample. After plea negotiations the charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Our client was pulled over by city police after failing to use a turn signal. He was subsequently arrested for DUI and provided a 0.12 breath sample. The charge was ultimately reduced to reckless driving.

DUI

An area woman was arrested for DUI after her car drove into a ditch late at night. She admitted to taking prescription medication and drinking wine prior to the accident. The police officer reported that she showed multiple signs of impairment during field sobriety tests. We conducted a full evaluation of the circumstances of her arrest, and discovered that the observable evidence on the officer’s camera didn’t match up to the report. Additionally it appeared that the officer hadn’t followed required procedures when making the arrest. As a result the DUI was dismissed.

DUI

An area man was arrested for DUI after his truck ran off the road and into a tree. He admitted to drinking prior to driving, and the officer reported that he had slurred speech and smelled of alcohol beverages. The officer also reported multiple failures during field sobriety testing. The charge was ultimately reduced to reckless driving and our client’s criminal record was cleared of the DUI arrest and he did not lose his driver’s license.

DUI & Littering Our client was charged with DUI 1 ^st and littering. Both criminal charges were resolved through a negotiated plea to a minor (2 point) traffic ticket.

DUI & Open Container Our client was charged with DUI and Open Container. On the date of jury selection the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the open container and reduce the DUI charge to reckless driving.

DUI - Accident Client was charged with DUI 1 ^st after a traffic collision occurring in Lexington County. During a trial held in the Lexington DUI Court, Mr. Snell made a motion to dismiss based on the State's non-compliance with required arrest procedures, as well as insufficiency of evidence actually presented to the Court. The Court granted the motion, resulting in a total dismissal of the DUI charge.

Driving Under the Influence (DUI)

We were hired to file an appeal on behalf of an individual recently convicted of DUI. They had originally hired another law firm, and after a trial were found guilty. Mr. Snell prepared an appeal arguing that the court had allowed the prosecutor to go into matters that were irrelevant and improperly prejudiced the defendant. The appellant court agreed with the appeal, and reversed the conviction.

DUI - Breath Test Refusal Our client was charged with DUI and refused the breath test procedure. After plea negotiations he was allowed to enter a plea to publically disorderly conduct. This is a non-traffic related offense, meaning that although our client had to pay a fine, his car insurance rates and license points are not affected.

DUI - Marijuana Our client was pulled over at night due to a burned out brake light. Client admitted to the police that he has recently smoked marijuana. He participated in field sobriety tests that according to the police indicated multiple "clues" that he was under the influence. On the day his trial was to begin the prosecutor and James Snell negotiated a resolution where he would be allowed to plead guilty to a defective brake light in exchange for a dismissal of the DUI.

Driving Under the Influence (DUI)

Our client was arrested for DUI after his car ran off the road and ended up in a ditch. We notified the court and prosecutor we were fully challenging the case. After obtaining discovery materials Mr. Snell discovered that there were circumstances creating significant doubt that the state could prove its case. As a result the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the DUI in exchange for our client accepting a minimum speeding ticket.

DUI - Striking Fixtures Our client was charged with DUI and with Striking Fixtures. A private citizen identified our client by car description and tag number as having committed a "hit and run" on a mailbox. The police followed up by going to the client's home and making the arrest. At the police station our client refused the breathalyzer. After negotiations with the prosecutor the charge was reduced to reckless driving and striking fixtures.

DUI 3rd Offense Our client was charged with a DUI 3 ^rd offense after being pulled over for allegedly swerving between lanes. This was a felony charge pending in General Sessions. Field sobriety tests were administered, and our client was told he "failed." After a review of the evidence, including the video recording of the traffic stop, we negotiated a resolution to reckless driving.

DUI Accident A client was charged with DUI after a traffic accident (running off the road and into a tree). He refused field sobriety tests or the breathalyzer. After a jury trial he was acquitted of all charges.

DUI Accident Our client was charged with DUI after being involved in a motorcycle wreck. His blood alcohol level was tested at a 0.12, which is high enough to put him at the mid-level for South Carolina DUI charges. James Snell was retained and notified the court and prosecution that our client was pleading “not-guilty.” After determining that there were circumstances which prevented the case from going forward the DUI charge was dismissed prior to the case going to trial.

DUI Accident Client charged with DUI 1 ^st after a single car accident. Allowed to plead guilty to reckless driving.

DUI Accident Our client was charged with DUI after being involved in an accident. Our client had taken the prescription drug Ambien. The charge was reduced to reckless driving prior to trial. As a result our client’s driver’s license was not suspended.

DUI Accident Our client was arrested for DUI after being involved in a minor motor vehicle accident. Although there was no alcohol in their system, the police believed that there was evidence that they were under the influence of prescription medications. The DUI charge was reduced to reckless driving.

DUI Conviction Client was arrested for DUI. After being convicted at trial the South Carolina Court of Appeals reversed the conviction, resulting in no charges for our client. The grounds for the reversal were that the defendant was taken off camera for the breathalyzer test. Although you could hear the test being given, you could not actually see it. This resulted in a published opinion which set precedent for other DUI cases in South Carolina.

DUI Drugs Our client was charged with DUI based on suspicion of drug impairment. The case was dismissed prior to being called for trial.

DUI with Accident Our client was charged with DUI after a minor car accident. She was taken to the hospital and submitted to an alcohol and drug blood screening test. The results came back at 0.22 BAC, triggering the highest level of DUI 1 ^st in South Carolina including the new Emma's Law penalties. James Snell filed specific court motions to challenge the admissibility of the blood test results. On the day of trial the prosecution agreed to voluntarily dismiss the DUI, and instead allow our client to plead guilty to a minimum level speeding offense (2 points and an $81 fine).

DUI, Drug Possession

We represented a young man charged with DUI, drug possession, and other related offenses. This was from a traffic stop where the officer claimed to observe our client crossing the center line of the road. After extensive negotiations, the DUI charge was reduced to reckless driving. The remaining criminal charges were referred into pre-trial intervention.

DUI, Leaving the Scene of an Accident

Our client was charge with both DUI and leaving the scene of an accident. We obtained the accident report, officer’s report, and a video of the DUI field tests. We also notified the court that we would be fully contesting the charges. Prior to trial he DUI was reduced to reckless driving, and the leaving the scene was dismissed.

DUI, Possession, Open Container, Drug Paraphernalia Our client was arrested for DUI, marijuana possession, open container of alcohol, and drug paraphilia. After review of the evidence, and discussion with the prosecutor, the DUI was reduced reckless driving and the open container and drug paraphernalia charges were dismissed.

DVHAN Our female client was charged with DVHAN after an argument with her husband. She was facing a mandatory prison term due to the seriousness of her charge. After negotiations with the prosecutor the charge was reduced to a misdemeanor. The client paid a small fine and was not sentenced to any prison or probationary sentence.

DVHAN Our client was charged with DVHAN for an alleged incident involving threatening his spouse with a firearm. Client was permitted to plead guilty to misdemeanor assault, allowing him to avoid prison time. This plea allowed our client to remain in the military.

DVHAN Our client was charged with DVHAN for an alleged incident involving assaulting a former boyfriend. Client was permitted to plead guilty to misdemeanor assault, allowing her to avoid prison time.

DVHAN Our client was charged with DVHAN for an alleged incident involving threatening his wife with a firearm. Client was permitted to plead guilty to misdemeanor DV 3 ^rd, allowing him to avoid prison time.

DVHAN Client was charged with felony DVHAN and facing one to ten years in prison. Prior to contacting our office he was scheduled to plead guilty "straight up" to felony 1st Degree Assault that carried up to ten years imprisonment. After we were retained we were able to obtain an agreement with the prosecutor to continue the case to allow the client to go to alcohol counseling. After the client was successful in that program, and completed a 26 week domestic abuse counseling program, the charge was dismissed.

Extortion Our client was charged for an alleged extortion attempt. He was arrested and the case prosecuted in General Sessions. After researching the law and discussing the allegations in detail with the prosecutor the charge was dismissed prior to trial.

Failure to Have the Proper Documents Our client was pulled over by a small town police officer and cited for failure to have proper documents. However the client did in fact have the proper documents at the time he was stopped. Even though the officer acknowledged that the client had the documentation he still wanted to proceed with prosecution. At the call of the case the court granted our motion to dismiss based on lack of probable cause and prosecutorial misconduct.

Failure to Stop for a Blue Light Our client was charged with failure to stop for a blue light. This offense carries up to three years in prison and is prosecuted in the Court of General Sessions. The charge was dismissed prior to trial.

Failure to Yield to the Right of Way Our client was charged with failure to yield the right of way by the South Carolina Highway Patrol. This was after a car accident resulting in property damage. Failure to yield right of way is a four point ticket. After a trial held in the Lexington County Traffic Court our client was found not-guilty. As a result she did not have to pay any fine, have any points go against her license, and the ticket will not increase her car insurance rates.

Family Court Order for Protection Our client was a wife whose husband served her with a Family Court Order for Protection under the Domestic Abuse Act. He was seeking a finding of misconduct on her part, along with financial and other relief. After being retained we filed a motion with the court to dismiss. At the day of the hearing rather than deal with a contested hearing the husband dismissed the petition.

Felony 2nd offense Drug Possession, Possession of Contraband in a County Jail Facility We were retained after our client had been served with a failure to appear bench warrant. The underlying charges including a felony 2 ^nd offense drug possession and a felony charge for possession of contraband in a county jail facility. The felony charges carried sentences of up to five years and ten years respectively. After an evaluation of our client’ discovery materials, including the prior record, it was determined that the 2 ^nd offense charge was not supported. Although our client had already been indicted by the county grand jury, the prosecutor agreed with our assessment (which involved an analysis of another state’s laws). That reduced that charge to a misdemeanor. The prosecutor offered to dismiss the remaining felony as part of a plea agreement. Our client plead and received a “time-served” jail sentence, which meant no further jail time or probation.

Felony Domestic Violence We represented a senior citizen charged with felony domestic violence. This was a very severe charge that came as a result of an allegation that her husband had been threatened with a weapon. That allowed our client to return home. We also recommended our client voluntarily enter into a counseling program. After completing that program all charges were dismissed.

Felony Drug Possession

We represented a young college student who was charged with a General Sessions level drug possession offense. There were pills found in his car after he was stopped for a traffic violation. The case was referred to pre-trial intervention, and upon completion the charge will be dismissed and our client’s record cleared.

Felony Drug Possession

Our client was arrested for a felony drug possession charge made during a routine traffic stop. He wanted to join the military, but learned that any resolution short of a complete dismissal could prevent that from happening. This even would prevent PTI. We were able to negotiate an arrangement were he plead guilty in traffic court, and as a result the drug charge was completely dismissed.

Felony DUI

We represented a client charged with Felony DUI w/ Great Bodily Injury. This is a serious offense carrying up to 15 years in prison. This charge was made after a serious wreck in which our client, along with other vehicle passengers, were injured. Our investigation revealed that the Highway Patrol has misidentified the driver of the vehicle, incorrectly charging our client. As a result of the information and witness statements obtained by this office, all charges against our client were dropped.

Felony Possession of Stolen Property Our client was arrested for a felony possession of a stolen motorcycle after being stopped by the Highway Patrol. When the officer ran the VIN of the motorcycle it was flagged as being close to a VIN of a bike reported stolen. Our client was arrested from the side of the road, taken to jail and had his bike impounded. Although the initial "offer" from the prosecutor was a request to plead guilty, the charge was ultimately dismissed before the case was called for trial.

First Degree Burglary Client was charged with first degree burglary and was facing 15 years to life imprisonment. Initially he was represented by another law firm. At a bond hearing an eyewitness identified him as the suspect and the court denied bond. Mr. Snell was subsequently retained and after our investigation discovered facts not found by the police the prosecutor agreed to drop all charges.

Habitual Offender Client was charged with violating the Habitual Offender law and facing a possible sentence of up to five years imprisonment. The charge was dismissed prior to trial.

Harassment Our client was charged with harassment and his case was originally referred to General Sessions. After reviewing the warrant the factual allegations of the case Mr. Snell determined that the case should be remanded back to misdemeanor court. After the case had been remanded it was ultimately dismissed by the prosecutor on the day of trial. Our Our client will now be eligible to have his record expunged (cleared) of any record of the charge.

Hit & Run We represented a young adult who was arrested for hit & run after a minor accident. Because the other car was occupied, the charge was prosecuted in General Sessions and our client was facing up to one year in the South Carolina Department of Corrections. We immediately noticed that there were unusual circumstance and that the allegations seemed to sound a little unusual. Ultimately it was determined that the situation stemmed from a mental health episode. After a diagnosis was obtained all charges were dropped.

Hit & Run Mr. Snell's client was charged with hit & run in Lexington County, and faced a sentence of up to one year in the South Carolina Department of Corrections. Client was referred into the pre-trial intervention program resulting in a dismissal of the charge.

Hit & Run and Assault 2nd Degree Our client was arrested for Hit & Run and Assault 2 ^nd Degree. He was facing up to three years in prison. Our office conducted a pre-trial investigation which uncovered additional evidence and a new witness to his case. As a result all charges were dismissed.

Illegal Re-Entry into the United States Client was charged with illegal re-entry into the United States. This was a case pending in Federal Court and prosecuted by the U.S. Attorney's office. After researching the client's prior record Ms. Snell was able to determine that he did not have a prior drug conviction for sentencing purposes as determined by the government. After sharing our legal research the government changed its position on that issue, assisting our client in avoid a recommended additional prison sentence under the Sentencing Guidelines.

Kidnapping & DVHAN Client was charged with kidnapping and criminal domestic violence of a high and aggravated nature. He was facing up to thirty years in prison plus entrance on the sex offender registry. After negotiations with the prosecutor the client's charge was reduced to a single misdemeanor and he received a time served jail sentence.

Kilogram of Cocaine We represented a client who was arrested with a kilogram of cocaine. This is an approximate street value of $30,000. The case was referred to the State Grand Jury after evidence was uncovered linking the cocaine to a drug distribution conspiracy spread across multiple counties. South Carolina law is extremely harsh for this amount of cocaine, and our client was facing a minimum prison sentence of 25 years (no part of which may be suspended). After a thorough investigation by James Snell, and an extensive discussions with the state, the charge was ultimately reduced to a significantly lesser offense, that while still carrying a possible lengthy prison time also allowed the court to consider a non-custodial sentence. After agreeing to this reduction, our client was ultimately sentenced to 30 months of probation. This was considered a major success in that this reduction and favorable sentence had the effect of saving our client literally decades of prison time.

Leaving Scene of Accident, DUI Our client was arrested for leaving the scene of an accident and DUI. The leaving the scene charge carries a maximum sentence of up to one year in prison, and is prosecuted in General Sessions. The client’s DUI charge remained in traffic court. After filing our initial challenges to both charges the prosecutor reviewed the evidence obtained by the police officer and dismissed the leaving the scene charge. This left the DUI still pending in Magistrate Court. Prior to the case being called for trial the DUI was reduced to a reckless driving. This resulted in the DUI being removed from our client’s record, and our client not being subjected to a license suspension, SR-22 insurance, ADSAP course, or interlock requirement.

Lewd Act Upon a Minor James Snell represented the first person to successfully petition the court for removal of lifetime electronic monitoring requirements. The case involved a man who was convicted of lewd act upon a minor (now known as CSC w/ Minor 3 ^rd Degree). As a part of his sentence he was placed on the sex offender registry, required to serve out a period of probation, and then under South Carolina law was subject to continued electronic monitoring. After ten years a defendant is eligible to petition the court for removal of this requirement. Mr. Snell filed that motion, and then represented him at court hearing. The judge found that he was eligible to have the electronic monitor removed.

Marijuana Possession Our client was with a group of friends in a public setting when they were approached by law enforcement. A small amount of marijuana was found and the officer charged everyone present. Our client was concerned with how this criminal charge might affect employment prospects. After explaining our clients concerns to the officer Mr. Snell was able to obtain an agreement resulted in our client’s charge being dismissed.

Military Domestic Violence Our client was active duty military. He was accused of committing an assault against his wife. If he had been convicted he would have been automatically discharged. On the day of trial the prosecutor offered a reduced charge. After declining this offer and requesting a trial by jury the charge was ultimately dismissed.

Minor Possession of Alcohol Our client was charged with minor in possession of alcohol and an unlawful identification card. Our client was a college student. Prior to trial all charges were dismissed, our client was not required to enroll in any program or pay any fine.

Misdemeanor

We represented a client who was arrested as part of a police anti-prostitution sting. Police had ran an advertisement enticing men to call for female companionship. When men responded they were invited to an area motel, and then once there summarily arrested. Our client got caught up in this and was arrested and taken to jail. Our client really wanted to try to keep this charge off of his record so as to not jepordize his future. We began the process by notifying the court that we were fully contesting the charge. Later, after some time we filed a motion to dismiss based on an unusual circumstance that arose during the initial court date. As a result our client’s charge was dismissed.

Misdemeanor Our client was handcuffed by area police while receiving a ticket for illegally parking in the road. This was after he had objected to commercial traffic using a private driveway in front of his house. We notified the prosecuting officer that there was no evidence that our client was in a road and requested that they dismiss the case. The prosecuting officer disagreed, and instead called the case to trial before a jury. At the conclusion of the state’s case the court returned a directed verdict of not-guilty.

Misdemeanor We represented a client charged with shoplifting in the City of Columbia Municipal Court. This was after a major retail store’s loss prevention officers accused our client of stealing. Our client really needed to avoid being convicted of shoplifting so that he could keep his job. We began the process by notifying the court that we were fully contesting the charge, and that we would be preparing a comprehensive defense. Prior to the case being called for trial the charge was dismissed.

Misdemeanor We represented a client charged with too fast for conditions and possession of marijuana. After discussions with the officer on how the marijuana charge could negatively affect our client's school and work situation, the officer was so sympathetic he elected to dismiss both charges.

Summary Court / Misdemeanor Charges

Our client was charged with failure to yield the right of way, and driving with no proof of insurance. He had been involved in an accident causing significant damage to both vehicles, along with possible medical treatment sought by the occupants of the other car. The most concerning charge was the operating uninsured- a conviction results in a 6 month license suspension, which would cost him his employment. Most concerning was that on the day of the accident he was in-fact driving uninsured. On the day of trial we were able to negotiate a dismissal of that charge in exchange for accepting the failure to yield ticket. As a result our client was able to keep his license and employment.

Molestation of a Family Member Our client was served with court paperwork filed by the Department of Social Services seeking to place him on the central registry of abuse and neglect based on allegations that he had molested a family member. A hearing was held before a Family Court judge. After making a motion to dismiss, based on an objection to unsubstantiated hearsay, the court granted the motion dismissing the DSS petition. Our client was not required to register.

Molesting a Young Child Our client was accused of molesting a young child. After we were retained Mr. Snell notified the police department that our client would not be consenting to any interviews and would not provide any statement. Ultimately the investigation was closed without any charges being filed.

Motorcycle DUI Our client was charged with DUI and driving under suspension after allegedly being found “passed out” on a motorcycle. After negotiations with the prosecution the DUS was dismissed and the DUI was reduced to reckless driving.

Multiple Counts of Armed Robbery

Client was charged with multiple counts of armed robbery as part of a home invasion scheme. There were multiple eyewitnesses, not all of whom cooperated with law enforcement. Investigating police officers reported, at least initially, that the client had confessed. All charges were dismissed prior to trial.

Open Container

James Snell represented a client charged with an open container of alcohol while she was sitting in the passenger seat of a parked vehicle. Mr. Snell was able to negotiate a dismissal of the charge with the citing police officer at a pre-trial hearing held in the Magistrate Court.

Possession of Cocaine and Drug Paraphernalia Our client was charged with possession of cocaine and drug paraphernalia after the police conducted a raid at a house he was visiting. We notified the prosecutor’s office that no plea deals would be accepted and that the case should be scheduled for trial. As a result all charges were dismissed.

Possession of Crystal Meth & Criminal Conspiracy Client was charged with possession of crystal meth and criminal conspiracy in General Sessions. This was after law enforcement responded to a "party" in a motel room. All charges were dismissed prior to trial.

Possession of Marijuana Our client was arrested for simple possession of marijuana. This was based on a traffic stop where a small quantity of a “green, leafy substance” was found inside the car. After notifying the officer that we were fully challenging the case, and requesting copies of drug analysis, in-car video, chain of custody materials, and other documents that the officer would need to produce to prove the case all charges were ultimately dismissed.

Possession of Marijuana, Driving Without Proof of Insurance and Speeding

We represented a client who was charged with possession of marijuana, driving without proof of insurance and speeding. After showing proof of insurance that charge was dismissed. Mr. Snell was also able to negotiate a dismissal of the marijuana charge in exchange for paying the speeding ticket fine.

Our client received a too fast for conditions ticket after being involved in a minor accident. After notifying the court and police officer that our client would be requesting a fully contested trial the ticket was dismissed.

Public Disorderly Conduct Our client was arrested for public disorderly conduct. He was arrested after police responded to a 911 report that he had been acting strangely on the side of the road. Our client was a business professional, and did not have the character of someone who would be doing anything illegal. When the officer responded he did find our client outside close to the the road (and in the vicinity of his house) where he was going about his regular activities, nothing inappropriate. After further investigation Mr. Snell believed that a health condition that our client has was mistaken by the officer as being symptomatic of drug or alcohol intoxication. We obtained medical records and forwarded them to the prosecutor and other documentation of how the symptoms can be mistaken for intoxication. After the case was set for trial, but prior to the date of court, the prosecutor elected to dismiss the charge.

Public Disorderly Conduct and Trespassing at a Hotel Our client was charged with public disorderly conduct and trespassing at hotel. The allegations included behaviors indicative of intoxication. We obtained copies of our client's recent medical records to show that the behaviors indicated were likely the result of a medical condition. As a result the prosecutor and judge agreed to a pre-trial dismissal of both charges.

Rape of Teenage Daughter We were hired to represent a man charged with the forcible rape of his teenage daughter. This was an extraordinarily serious allegation, and our client was facing decades of prison time. Mr. Snell used the preliminary hearing to learn how insufficient the police investigation had been. He then reviewed the discovery materials and found multiple examples of inconsistent statements, including evidence likely manufactured by the accuser. After advising the prosecutor that no plea bargain would be accepted the charges were dismissed.

Receiving Stolen Property

We represented a young man who was charged with receiving stolen property. The factual background was that an area homeowner reported having items stolen. The homeowner conducted his own investigation and found the items at a local resale shop. Law enforcement was contacted and a "detective" obtained the receipt and the surveillance footage where the stolen items were sold by another young man. When the "detective" approached the young man who sold the items to the store he said he didn't steal them, and instead he obtained them for free from our client in a parking lot.

Satisfied with this version of events the "detective" arrested and charged our client with a crime. At the initial court appearance the "detective" informed attorney James R. Snell, Jr., that this case was "open and shut". Undeterred, we notified the court that we were requesting a fully contested trial and obtained the services of a defense investigator. We were able to establish proof that our client was the victim of a conspiracy to frame him, and that he was completely innocent. The charge was then fully dismissed before trial.

Reckless Driving Client was charged in municipal court with reckless driving. On the day of jury trial the court granted a motion to dismiss on the basis of a discovery violation by the police officer. The charge was dismissed.

Reckless Driving Client was criminally prosecuted for reckless driving. He had actually been arrested and taken to jail for the charge. On the day of his trial, Mr. Snell notified the prosecutor that his client would not be pleading guilty. As a result, the prosecutor finally dismissed the charge. This will result in an expungement of our client's record.

School Expulsion

Our client was a middle-school student who was put up for expulsion based on allegations that he had sexually assaulted another student. After a hearing in which the totality of the circumstances were explored and challenged, the expulsion recommendation was dismissed and our student was allowed back to school with only a minor misconduct finding.

School Expulsion

Our client attended a local high school. He was recommended for expulsion based on allegations of bullying and making racists threats. After a hearing in which the school continued to press for expulsion our client was allowed to return to his classes.

Second Degree Burglary Client was arrested for second degree burglary related to a house break in. He was referred into the pre-trial intervention program (PTI) which resulted in all charges being dismissed.

Sexual Abuse Client was accused of sexually abusing a five year old child. This had been reported to law enforcement after a forensic interviewer indicated allegations that were suggestive of abuse. Prior to meeting with law enforcement the client contacted Mr. Snell who advised not to meet with or speak to the police. He recommended a private polygraph examination which the client was able to successfully pass. These results were forwarded to the investigator who then closed the case.

Sexual Abuse of a Child We were retained to represent a young father who was under investigation for sexually abusing his child. Prior to our being retained both parents had meet with the police and had allowed their child to be interviewed. The parents were not allowed to listen in on the interview, but the interview gave them both the impression that the child had made a credible report of abuse. In addition the father had voluntarily participated in a police interrogation session and was told that he appeared deceptive. Although this seems like significant evidence of guilt, we know from representing other clients in similar investigations that you cannot be sure that the feedback clients have received is accurate and that the police aren't simply on a fishing expedition. A few days later we were notified that the police were dropping the investigation and no charges would be brought.

Sexual Abuse of a Family Member Mr. Snell was hired to provide representation of a client during an investigation related to a report that he had sexually abused a young family member. Police had attempted to contact him at his job, and he was worried that if just word of the allegations got out it could cost him his employment. We notified the police that he had hired Mr. Snell, and that all future communications must be directed only to our office. We were able to oversee a defense investigation which demonstrated that the allegations were false. As a result no charges were filed.

Sexual Assault We represented a man who was in the process of going through a divorce. During the pendency of that his wife contacted law enforcement and filed charges that he has sexually assaulted her. As a result he was arrested and charged with spousal sexual batter, this is a major felony that carries a lengthy prison sentence as well as mandatory sex offender registration. After reviewing the accusations and employing our own investigator, all charges were dismissed.

Sexual Assault

A grandfather retained us to assist in a police investigation stemming from an allegation that he had sexually abused his granddaughter. The allegation was very serious, and he could have faced up to a life sentence. There were however some inconsistencies with the girl’s story. Mr. Snell recommended that we conduct a polygraph in our office to try to prove our client’s innocence. Our client was successful. The results were provided to law enforcement which ultimately closed the investigation without bringing charges.

Sexual Assault of a Young Child

We represented an area school employee accused of sexually assaulting a young child. Our client contacted us as soon as they knew of the allegation. This was prior to being contacted by the police or actually arrested. After notifying the police that we were representing the accused, the investigator contacted our office requesting to interview our client. Mr. Snell determined that this interview, or any cooperation, would not be in our client's best interest and declined the arrest. Ultimately, the case was closed with no charges being brought.

Sexual Conduct with a Minor 2nd Degree Our client was a young gay man. Through a smart-phone dating app ("Grindr") he met a teenager who had registered into the site as an eighteen year old gay man. The teenager was in fact fifteen years old. As a result of the two meeting our client was charged with Criminal Sexual Conduct with a Minor 2 ^nd Degree and Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor. The Criminal Sexual Conduct charge is a serious felony in South Carolina carrying a maximum sentence of up to twenty years and requiring registration on the sex offender registry. We submitted our client to a comprehensive psychological evaluation. We also arranged for a comprehensive defense-oriented follow-up investigation. As a result of the specific circumstances of this case the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the most serious Criminal Sexual Conduct charge and allow the Contributing to the Delinquency of a Minor charge to be resolve through Pre-Trial Intervention (PTI). As a result of this resolution our client's criminal charges are both dismissed, the record of the arrest is expunged from his record, he is not required to register as a sex offender, and he did not have to do any jail time, serve any probation, or pay any fine.

Shoplifting Our client was arrested for shoplifting at a major retailer. After obtaining documentation that our client's circumstances may be related to a medical condition all charges were dismissed by the prosecutor prior to trial.

Shoplifting Our college aged client was arrested for shoplifting after an incident in a local drugstore. Prior to our client having to appear in front of a judge we negotiated entrance into the pre-trial intervention (PTI) program. Once our client completes the program the charge will be dismissed.

Shoplifting Client was arrested for shoplifting by the Spartanburg County Sheriff's Department. After retaining our office, we filed and served a jury trial request and discovery motions to require the prosecutor to turn over documentation about the case. On the day of trial, the prosecutor still had not responded to our discovery motions and did not otherwise have any witnesses to present. At the call of the case, Mr. Snell made a motion to dismiss for lack of prosecution; in response the prosecutor agreed to dismiss the charge.

Shoplifting We represented a man who was charged with shoplifting from a local retailer. After notifying the court that we were contesting the charge, and requesting documentation relevant to the arrest include any video recording, all charges were ultimately dismissed.

Simple Assault Client was arrested and charged with simple assault on an EMS worker. On the day of trial he was requested to plead guilty and not pay any fine. After declining to plead guilty it was learned that the prosecuting police officer had not come to Court. The Court then dismissed the case. Subsequently the police appealed and the dismissal was affirmed by the Circuit Court.

Simple Possession of Marijuana Our client was charged with Simple Possession of Marijuana. James Snell filed motions to require the prosecutor to turn over all the paperwork related to the drug test and proof the substance was correctly placed into police evidence. When the case was first scheduled for trial the officer had not complied with this motion. The court continued the case to allow the prosecutor to comply. After the prosecutor turned the material we determined that the alleged marijuana had been destroyed by the Sheriff's Department prior to the court date. As a result the prosecutor did not have any drugs to submit into evidence, nor were any alleged drugs available for a defense evaluation. On the date of the rescheduled trial the judge granted Mr. Snell's motion to dismiss. Our client's record will be automatically expunged by the court.

Simple Possession of Marijuana Client was charged with simple possession of marijuana, possession of alcohol by a minor and a seatbelt violation. Ultimately, it was agreed that in exchange for admitting guilt for not wearing a seatbelt and payment of a $25 fine, the remaining two criminal charges against our client would be dismissed.

Simple Possession of Marjiuana Client was charged with simple possession of marijuana after being stopped for speeding. The court granted a motion made by Mr. Snell to suppress the marijuana as being the result of an improper search made by law enforcement. The charges against the client were subsequently dismissed by the Court.

Speeding & Marijuana Possession Client was cited for speeding and possession of marijuana after being stopped on Interstate I-95 traveling to Florida. The police agreed to dismiss the marijuana charge in exchange for pleading guilty and remitting a fine to the lowest level of speeding in South Carolina.

Stalking James Snell was retained to represent a client charged with stalking of an ex-girlfriend. Our client was very concerned that this charge could jeopardize his career. During his review of the case, Mr. Snell discovered that the police investigator had issued a subpoena in violation of South Carolina law. Ultimately the charge was dismissed prior to trial, and the arrest has now been expunged.

Theft of Public Funds Client was charged with theft of public funds (over $125,000) in a case prosecuted in Federal Court by the U.S. Attorney's office. Client retained Mr. Snell as soon as the law enforcement investigation began in earnest, allowing us an opportunity to be involved with an FBI investigation. Even though our client had confessed to embezzlement of a high dollar amount, the case was ultimately resolved through a sentence of house arrest and probation.

Theft of School Money James Snell represented a high school student that was charged with theft of some school money. There were two other co-defendants also charged. We immediately began by notifying the court that we were contesting the charge and requested a full copy of the police records about the case. After our review it appeared that there was no actual evidence connecting our client with any theft. At the pre-trial conference we notified the prosecuting officers that our client would not be considering nay plea bargain or PTI referral. The case was then scheduled for trial. On the day of trial the case was dismissed. Our client’s record is being expunged, and he did not have to pay any fines, fees, court costs, or go into PTI.

Theft of School Tablet

Client was charged with theft of a school for a tablet after signing for it to be sold to a local pawn shop. The tablet was recovered and returned to the school. After payment of restitution to the pawn shop both the shop and the school agreed to have the charges dismissed.

Theft, Break-In of an ATM We defended a client who was charged with the theft and break-in of a bank ATM. The charges included safecracking, S.C. Code § 16-11-390, which carries a potential prison sentence of up to thirty years. After investigating the circumstances of the case we were able to determine that there was insufficient evidence against our client. After notifying the prosecution that we would be taking the case to trial all charges were ultimately dismissed.

Third DUI

Our client was charged with his third DUI. Our office previously represented him on his two prior offenses, both of which were reduced to non-DUI offenses. In his last case he was observed to be weaving by the police officer. After being pulled over the officer believed that he was under the influence of alcohol and\or medications. Prior to trial this DUI was reduced to reckless driving.

Third DUI

We represented a client arrested for DUI by a local Sheriff’s Department. He tried to cooperate during the arrest, answering all the officer’s questions and even giving a breath sample. This meant that the evidence against him included admitting multiple drinks, performing poorly on standardized field sobriety tests, and a breath test result showing a 0.18 BAC (making the case the most serious type of DUI 1st under South Carolina law). After fully examining the evidence and discussions with the officer the charge was reduced to reckless driving. This will erase the DUI arrest from our client’s record and really give him a 2nd chance at a fully productive life.

Our young client was facing a third DUI arrest. We recommended an immediate intervention into a counseling and treatment program. After review of the evidence we uncovered details that would make it difficult for the prosecutor to prevail. As a result the charge was ultimately reduced to reckless driving. As a result our client was able to avoid jail time and had the DUI arrest record removed.

Trafficking

We represented a young adult who was pulled over on I-95 while driving from Florida to New York. Our client's failure to use a turn signal while making multiple lane changes was captured on the police officer's dash-cam, documenting a legal basis for the traffic stop. The client gave consent to the police officer to search the rental car he was driving. Over a kilogram of cocaine was discovered. Upon roadside questioning, given after Miranda, our client admitted to being a "mule", being paid to transport the cocaine. As a result, the police officer charged him with trafficking, and he was facing a minimum of a 25-year prison sentence. This was a situation where there was not any available legal or factual defense, however, based on our client's young age, complete lack of criminal history, and how it appeared he had been taken advantage of by the real professional drug dealers, it would be completely unfair to subject them to that high of a sentence. After lengthy negotiations with the prosecutor, the charge was lowered to a level allowing for the possibility of a probation sentence. At the court hearing, the judge agreed to accept that reduction and sentenced our client to a probationary sentence under the youthful offender act. This allows our client the opportunity to avoid any prison sentence and to eventually obtain a full expungement of this charge off of his record.

Trafficking Cocaine

We represented a client charged with trafficking cocaine. The charge was the result of a search made after a traffic stop. Mr. Snell argued that although there was a trafficking level quantity of cocaine found in the vehicle, there was not enough evidence to show that our client was in possession of the cocaine or even knew of its existence. All charges were dismissed.

Trafficking in Crack Cocaine Client was charged with trafficking in crack cocaine and was facing up to twenty five years in prison. After investigating the circumstances surrounding the arrest surrounding the arrest all charges were dismissed pre-trial.

Trafficking in Marijuana Client was prosecuted for trafficking in marijuana. Our client was a resident where law enforcement executed a search warrant and found several bales of marijuana. All charges were dismissed prior to trial.

Trespassing

Client was charged with trespassing on neighbor's land following a dispute. At the day of trial the charges were dismissed by the arresting officer.

Trespassing Our client was criminally charged with trespassing at a large store. At the pre-trial conference held in the Magistrate's court, the charge was dismissed.

Tresspassing Our client wanted to report a complaint involving the conduct of a police officer. He made the "mistake" of trying to do so in-person at the police station. In response to his complaint, the police officer elected to arrest him for trespassing. At trial the Court granted our motion for directed verdict, entering a finding of "not guilty."

Two Counts of Attempted Murder

We represented a client charged with two counts of attempted murder after he was accused of shooting a high-powered rifle into a car. We immediately recognized that there was minimal evidence our client was the actual shooter. At the conclusion of the preliminary hearing, Mr. Snell made a motion to dismiss for lack of probable cause. Although it is very unusual for this type of motion to be granted, the court granted the motion resulting in the charges against our client being dismissed.

Underage 21 Our client was arrested for a "zero tolerance" DUI based on being under 21. She admitted to drinking and attempted field sobriety tests but refused the breathalyzer. After notifying the prosecutor of potential legal issues with the case the charge was reduced to reckless driving.

Unlawful Assault Client was charged with an unlawful assault on a child who had been slapped in the face. Prior to retaining our office the client had admitted to striking the child. After discussions with the prosecutor all charges were dismissed prior to trial.

Unlawful Conduct Towards a Child

Our client was charged with unlawful conduct towards a child. This is a felony carrying up to 10 years in prison. The charge came about after a young infant was taken into the emergency room for injuries. We obtained the relevant medical records which indicated that there was insufficient evidence of any criminal action by our client. Although a plea offer was made by the prosecutor, our client declined. Ultimately, the charge was dismissed prior to trial.

Unlawful Discharging of a Firearm A client was charged with unlawfully discharging a firearm inside city limits. The charge was for shooting a pistol in an apartment complex parking lot early in the morning while in an argument. After a jury trial he was found not-guilty of the charge.

Unlawful Prescription Drug Possession Client was charged with unlawful prescription drug possession. This was a case prosecuted by the Solicitor's office in General Sessions. After discussions with the prosecutor the charges were dismissed.

Violating Probation Client was arrested and charged with violating his probation. He was facing a revocation of up to ten years, which was requested by his probation officer. After a hearing his probation was reinstated and he was allowed to return home.